Demo
Demo Presentation Feedback Report
I&E 590
Demo Presentation Feedback
3.62/5
Avg Rating220Total Responses
9Groups
Key Takeaways
Across the class, feedback shows a solid foundation: many teams were praised for clear structure, strong openings, polished slides, and engaging demos or stories. The most common struggles were delivery-related, especially speaking too quietly, limited audience engagement, and pacing issues such as speaking too quickly or running over time, which sometimes made otherwise clear ideas feel less compelling.
Investment Signal
Would Hire / Invest
220 responses
57.3%would hire / invest
42.7%would not
Class-Wide Analytics
Top Speaking Problems
220 responses
- Speaks too quietly50 mentions (23% of responses)
- No audience engagement43 mentions (20% of responses)
- Speaks too quickly35 mentions (16% of responses)
- Monotone delivery: Material is presented in a monotone voice34 mentions (15% of responses)
- Poor visual design: Poor visual design (poor contrast, hard-to-read fonts, excessive animations)25 mentions (11% of responses)
- Overcrowded slides20 mentions (9% of responses)
- Information overload: Information overload! Too many stories in the same presentation17 mentions (8% of responses)
- Reading from slides: Speakers just read directly from the slides16 mentions (7% of responses)
- Goes over time15 mentions (7% of responses)
- Poor team dynamics: Doesn't work effectively as a team presenting (present over one another, don't face each other when speaking)14 mentions (6% of responses)
- Missing CTA / conclusion: Missing call to action (if appropriate) and/or strong conclusion13 mentions (6% of responses)
- Doesn't look at audience: Doesn't look at audience when speaking / looks down at phone or notes / looking at floor12 mentions (5% of responses)
- Appears unprepared: Team appears unprepared (fumbling, awkward pauses, getting off track, rambling)9 mentions (4% of responses)
- Poor body language: Poor body language (crossed arms)9 mentions (4% of responses)
- Doesn't face audience: Doesn't face audience when speaking8 mentions (4% of responses)
- Complex / jargon-heavy: Difficult to understand content (complex info not explained, too much jargon)5 mentions (2% of responses)
- Disorganized: Presentation is not organized5 mentions (2% of responses)
- Plots not well explained: Plots (if shown) are not well explained5 mentions (2% of responses)
- Bad data visualizations: Plots (if shown) are examples of bad visualizations3 mentions (1% of responses)
Rating Distribution
220 responses
3.62avg
- 5 stars
- 23 ratings (10% of ratings)
- 4 stars
- 111 ratings (50% of ratings)
- 3 stars
- 67 ratings (30% of ratings)
- 2 stars
- 18 ratings (8% of ratings)
- 1 star
- 1 rating (0% of ratings)
All Groups
Browse in-depth, confidential feedback collected for each group.
Default order
- Team Keystone
- Rating
- 4.1 out of 5
- Invest
- 72%
- Reviews
- 25
- Team Cobalt
- Rating
- 3.9 out of 5
- Invest
- 74%
- Reviews
- 27
- Team Drift
- Rating
- 3.6 out of 5
- Invest
- 69%
- Reviews
- 26
- Team Brightline
- Rating
- 3.7 out of 5
- Invest
- 67%
- Reviews
- 27
- Team Ember
- Rating
- 3.6 out of 5
- Invest
- 67%
- Reviews
- 27
- Team Grove
- Rating
- 3.8 out of 5
- Invest
- 44%
- Reviews
- 25
- Team Harbor
- Rating
- 3.2 out of 5
- Invest
- 43%
- Reviews
- 23
- Team Fieldstone
- Rating
- 3.4 out of 5
- Invest
- 33%
- Reviews
- 18
- Team Aurora
- Rating
- 3.2 out of 5
- Invest
- 32%
- Reviews
- 22
Ready to use this with your class?
Next, create a feedback form for your own presentation day.