Demo
Team Harbor
Team Harbor did especially well at making the product feel real and compelling through a strong demo, clear problem framing, and thoughtful customer personas. The biggest opportunity for the next presentation is to tighten delivery—especially speaking volume/clarity and pacing—so the strong content is easier for the audience to follow from start to finish.
Strengths
Reviewers consistently praised the demo, storytelling, and the way the presentation brought the idea to life.
Many comments highlighted strong problem definition, pain-point framing, and thoughtful customer perspectives/personas.
To Improve
A recurring concern was that some speakers were too quiet, hard to hear, or needed to project more clearly.
Reviewers often felt some slides had too much text or too much information and would be clearer if simplified.
Investment Signal
Would you hire this group / invest in them?
Based on this presentation alone · 23 responses
Presentation Analytics
Top Speaking Problems
23 responses
- Speaks too quietly16 mentions (70% of responses)
- Goes over time8 mentions (35% of responses)
- No audience engagement6 mentions (26% of responses)
- Speaks too quickly4 mentions (17% of responses)
- Doesn't look at audience: Doesn't look at audience when speaking / looks down at phone or notes / looking at floor3 mentions (13% of responses)
- Information overload: Information overload! Too many stories in the same presentation3 mentions (13% of responses)
- Overcrowded slides3 mentions (13% of responses)
- Reading from slides: Speakers just read directly from the slides3 mentions (13% of responses)
- Doesn't face audience: Doesn't face audience when speaking2 mentions (9% of responses)
- Monotone delivery: Material is presented in a monotone voice2 mentions (9% of responses)
- Poor body language: Poor body language (crossed arms)2 mentions (9% of responses)
- Appears unprepared: Team appears unprepared (fumbling, awkward pauses, getting off track, rambling)1 mention (4% of responses)
- Bad data visualizations: Plots (if shown) are examples of bad visualizations1 mention (4% of responses)
- Complex / jargon-heavy: Difficult to understand content (complex info not explained, too much jargon)1 mention (4% of responses)
- Disorganized: Presentation is not organized1 mention (4% of responses)
- Missing CTA / conclusion: Missing call to action (if appropriate) and/or strong conclusion1 mention (4% of responses)
- Poor visual design: Poor visual design (poor contrast, hard-to-read fonts, excessive animations)1 mention (4% of responses)
Rating Distribution
23 responses
- 5 stars
- 1 rating (4% of ratings)
- 4 stars
- 7 ratings (30% of ratings)
- 3 stars
- 10 ratings (43% of ratings)
- 2 stars
- 5 ratings (22% of ratings)
- 1 star
- 0 ratings (0% of ratings)
What your peers are saying
What worked well28 responses
Your strongest asset was the combination of a compelling story and a concrete demo: reviewers repeatedly praised the demo, the problem definition, and the way you humanized users with personas and customer perspectives. Several also noted polished slides and an engaging opening that helped hold attention.
Reviewer #21
Reviewer #22
Areas to improve34 responses
The highest-impact improvement is delivery clarity: speak louder and more clearly, slow down a bit, and reduce slide-referencing so the audience can stay with you. A secondary but related opportunity is to simplify crowded slides and trim time so the ending doesn’t feel rushed.
Reviewer #21
Reviewer #22